What Is Block Level Sync

Block-level sync is a data synchronization method that operates at the level of individual data blocks or chunks, rather than the entire file. It allows for more efficient updates and transfers of only the changed or modified blocks, reducing the time and bandwidth required for synchronization processes.

Block level sync is a data synchronization method that operates at the individual data block level, allowing for efficient and incremental updates.
By analyzing and transferring only the modified blocks of data, block level sync reduces network bandwidth usage and speeds up the synchronization process.

This is box title

What Is Block Level Sync & How Does It Work in 2023?

do not use the following words: article, author, author’s name, personal name, this text, text, content, summary and do not copy the title, and Summarize the following at least 500 words in length and Break it up into shorter paragraphs (not need use word paragraph ) : What Is Block Level Sync & How Does It Work in 2023?
Cloudwards.net may earn a small commission from some purchases made through our site. However, any affiliate earnings do not affect how we review services.

Table of Contents

We frequently hear from our readers that some of our services, especially and OneDrive, sync files much faster than their competitors like , Box and . There’s a reason for that, and it’s called block-level sync — sometimes known as “differential sync,” “delta sync” or “incremental backup” — read our to learn more.

Key Takeaways:
Sync speeds are a big deal, particularly if you use cloud storage to collaborate with your coworkers. The faster your sync speeds, the closer you can get to sharing real-time updates. Even if you just use cloud storage for personal files, faster syncing lets you upload files in a hurry and access them from other devices sooner.

Although block-level sync is faster than its alternatives, it’s still mainly used by Dropbox and , which appear to have perfected the technology in a way competitors struggle to copy.

In this article, we’ll discuss the basic mechanics behind block-level copying, then talk about some of the cloud storage and that use this technique. We’ll also go into why some services don’t use it, and what this all means for you.

Basics of Block-Level Sync
Block-level file copying is a pretty simple concept. An online storage service “syncs” files by saving copies of them on its own servers. When you make a change to the file, a service with block-level copying will only copy the parts of the file that changed, instead of copying the whole file again.

It manages this by breaking each file into blocks. For example, Dropbox divides every file on its servers into blocks with 4MB of data each. These blocks are hashed with , then Dropbox stores a list of the hashed blocks for reference.

When syncing each file, Dropbox checks to see if any of the hashed blocks recorded on the blocklist are missing. If a block in the file matches a block on the list, it doesn’t need to be synced. If it doesn’t match, Dropbox returns instructions to upload that block, since it contains new content.

Note that the cloud storage service doesn’t need to decrypt the file to find the changed blocks. It can just compare the hashes. This will be important when we talk about zero-knowledge encryption.

Of course, if the file isn’t yet stored on the servers, Dropbox (or the other block-level storage service) will have to upload the entire file. This is why the initial upload of any file on Dropbox takes longer than subsequent syncs. It’s also the main area in which you’ll see competitors claiming a speed advantage.

Cloud Services That Use Block-Level Copying
Given that differential sync appears to be more efficient, especially for large databases, you might assume every cloud storage and backup service would use it. However, among cloud sync software, it’s not as common as you’d think. Only about a third of top services support block-level file sync, including Dropbox, OneDrive, pCloud and Amazon Drive.

The much longer list of well-known services that don’t support differential copying includes Google Drive, Box, Icedrive, Koofr, Tresorit, Egnyte, MEGA and iCloud. (Note that we found some conflicting information about whether Google Drive supports block-level file sync, but ultimately discovered no evidence that it does so).

Why wouldn’t a cloud storage platform use block-level sync, especially for large files? Mainly, it’s because block-level sync doesn’t make a difference when uploading or downloading new files — it only helps when you need to upload changes quickly, usually to make sure multiple devices all hold the same version of a single file.

Block-Level File Sync and Speeds
For our recent article on the , we tested 17 services to see how quickly they could upload and download a 5GB folder containing many different file types. We uploaded and downloaded the folder twice for each service, then took the average to get our final result.

The outcome for the upload time test was close. Less than a minute separated the top five finishers, and just over two minutes separated the top 10. The table below holds the results, measured in hours, minutes and seconds.

Icedrive came in first, taking an average of 7 minutes and 15 seconds to upload 5GB. You may recall from the last section that Icedrive doesn’t use block-level file sync. Neither does our second-fastest contestant, Google Drive, which took 7 minutes and 21 seconds on average. It’s the same story with third-place Koofr (average of 7 minutes, 42 seconds).

Download speed was a different story, and provides additional evidence for why not every cloud storage developer flocks to block-level sync. Take a look at our results below.

The services deliver a much more consistent showing here, with all the contenders clocking in less than 10 minutes apart. The top four services with block-level file sync (pCloud, Amazon Drive, OneDrive and Dropbox) are all in the top seven, but three file-level services (Icedrive, Google Drive and Tresorit) match them.

Why Doesn’t Everyone Use Block-Level Sync?
Dropbox is a good case study. It has the fastest upload speed of any service with block-level sync, and the fourth-fastest overall. While it has the seventh-fastest download speed, it’s only a minute behind the leader on average. That proves it has a well-built infrastructure.

However, that’s got nothing to do with its sync methods. Differential sync only matters when working with really large files, or if a file changed on one device needs to match those changes on all the others. These are common use cases of cloud storage, but they’re far from the only ones.

Software companies have limited resources, and have to decide what to focus on. Internal market research may have shown that most users store and retrieve data without editing it in the cloud. If a block-level file sync doesn’t deliver better speeds across the board, it’s easy to understand why some teams decided to focus on something else.

Backup vs Sync: Decoding the Confusion
We’d like to detour briefly to clear up a common source of confusion. So far, we’ve been talking about using cloud storage for file sync, not system backup.

We bring this up because both cloud storage and have a procedure called “differential,” and a lot of the sources we’ve examined get these confused. We’d like to set the record straight.

Users have three main options when syncing to a cloud backup service: full, differential and incremental. A full backup saves all your data, no matter what it is or when it last changed. A differential backup saves only the files that changed since your last full backup. An incremental backup is much faster, since it only saves the files changed since the last backup of any type.

In all three cases, we’re still saving the complete file, not just changed blocks like with Dropbox and the others. It works on the same principle — no need to recopy things that haven’t changed — but with a different scale and purpose. Block-level file sync is the sole process that saves only parts of a file to another device.

Block-Level Copying and Zero-Knowledge Encryption
We also need to address a persistent myth about block-level copying. You may have heard it reported that for a service to use block-level file sync, it cannot offer its users complete encryption. We’re happy to report that’s not true.

The myth goes like this: Zero-knowledge encryption is the most secure encryption method, in which the company can’t decode the files it stores. However, since the cloud storage service needs to know exactly what parts of each file have been changed, it must be able to read the unencrypted file. Therefore, differential sync is incompatible with zero-knowledge protection.

If you know how zero-knowledge works, you’ve already spotted the problem. As we explained above, the cloud storage platform doesn’t need to read the file; all it needs to know is whether the encrypted hash has or hasn’t changed in a given block. pCloud told us outright that its block-level sync applies to any file edited on the cloud, no matter how it’s encrypted.

This myth probably originates from Dropbox, a service well-known for using block-level file sync and lacking zero-knowledge encryption. However, correlation isn’t causation. We’ll just state one more time that there is no conflict between zero-knowledge encryption and block-level file sync.

Final Thoughts: Speed or Security
From VPNs to password managers to cloud storage, services that handle sensitive information are often portrayed as facing a choice between security and speed. However, the real world isn’t so binary. Our favorite , like , and , provide their users with both speed and security.

Block-level file sync is most important if you frequently use your cloud services for collaboration, sharing copies of files with people far away from you. If you mainly use it for storage and retrieval, this feature won’t matter as much.

We hope you now understand block-level file sync well enough to know if it matters for you when it’s being advertised. If you think we’ve missed anything important, or just want to chat about your favorite cloud services, hit up the comments section below. Thanks for reading!

Source: https://www.cloudwards.net/block-level-file-copying/

This is box title

Block level synchronization

Block level synchronization is an important concept in multi-threaded applications to ensure data integrity. In such applications, it is crucial to allow only one thread at a time to access a critical data structure. If multiple threads are allowed to change the same data structure simultaneously, it can lead to corruption. To prevent this, a lock is typically used to protect the data structure.

To better understand this concept, let’s consider an analogy. Imagine a public toilet that has a key hanging in a central location. In order to use the toilet, you need the key. The key serves two purposes: it allows you to enter the toilet, and it guarantees that nobody else will try to enter at the same time. If someone else wants to use the toilet while the key is in use, they have to wait for the key to become available.

The synchronized statement in Java works in a similar way. The parameter provided to the synchronized keyword acts as the key. When a thread encounters a synchronized block, it locks the key, allowing it to perform the necessary operations on the critical data structure. Once the thread completes its task, it unlocks the key, allowing other threads to access the data structure. If another thread attempts to lock the key while it is already locked by another thread, it will have to wait until the lock is released.

This mechanism ensures that only one thread can access the critical section of code at a time, preventing concurrent modifications that could result in data corruption. The synchronized keyword provides a built-in and convenient way to achieve thread safety by handling the locking and unlocking of resources automatically.

By using synchronized blocks effectively, developers can synchronize access to shared resources, preventing race conditions and ensuring data consistency. It is important to note that synchronization comes with a performance cost, as threads may have to wait for the lock to be released. Therefore, it is recommended to use synchronization judiciously and only when necessary.

In conclusion, block level synchronization using the synchronized keyword is a powerful technique to ensure data integrity in multi-threaded applications. It allows only one thread at a time to access a critical data structure, preventing concurrent modifications that could lead to corruption. By understanding and applying this concept correctly, developers can create thread-safe applications with consistent and reliable behavior.

Source: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/875175/block-level-synchronization

This is box title

Block Level Copying and Rsync

Source: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28819379/block-level-copying-and-rsync

This is box title

Block Level File Sync – How It’s Used In Cloud Computing

Cloud computing services have become an essential part of our lives, offering convenience and storage solutions for both individuals and companies. While most users don’t need to understand the technicalities behind these services, having some knowledge can be helpful when choosing a provider. In this article, we will explore the concept of block level file sync, which is becoming increasingly important in cloud computing.

Block level file sync is a method used for file transfer in cloud computing. Unlike transferring the entire file, it involves the transfer of specific blocks of the file. For instance, if you have a 1GB file and only a small portion of it has changed, block level file sync will only transfer the block that has been modified. This approach optimizes the synchronization process, as only the relevant blocks are transferred.

The primary function of block level file sync is to enable file changes to be updated and accessible across multiple devices. When you make changes to a file, the block level sync uploads only the modified block, rather than the entire file. This ensures that you can access the updated version of the file from any device connected to the cloud storage.

Implementing block level file sync is the responsibility of the cloud storage service providers. They decide whether to adopt this method based on their own considerations and preferences. However, for block level file sync to work, the initial upload of the entire file is necessary. After the initial upload, only the modified block needs to be synchronized. Therefore, if a 20MB block within a 1GB file is modified, the cloud service provider will only pull that specific block, saving bandwidth and time.

File-level synchronization is the primary alternative to block level file sync. With file-level sync, the entire file is transferred during synchronization. While this approach may seem inefficient compared to block level sync, it offers advantages such as complete file encryption. The cloud service provider only has access to the encrypted file, as the user holds the encryption key. Some providers may offer users the option to choose between block level and file-level sync, but ultimately, the decision lies with the provider.

Understanding block level sync is essential because it affects the functionality and user experience of cloud services. Cloud service providers that allow you to make on-the-go file changes often utilize block level sync. On the other hand, services that only support file-level sync will require you to upload and download the entire file. It is crucial to be aware of these differences when selecting a cloud service that aligns with your needs.

To determine whether a service employs block level sync, you can compare the upload times for the initial file transfer and subsequent modifications. If the subsequent uploads are significantly faster, it indicates that block level sync is being used. Otherwise, the service likely relies on file-level synchronization.

There are advantages and disadvantages to using block level sync. Some benefits include reduced bandwidth usage, quicker upload times for subsequent modifications, and efficient synchronization of large files. However, the main drawback is that block level sync does not provide complete file protection and privacy since the cloud service provider still has access to the blocks that are synchronized.

In conclusion, block level file sync plays a crucial role in seamless collaboration through cloud services. It offers significant benefits, and many cloud service providers are implementing it in their products. However, it is important to note that complete file protection and privacy are not achievable with block level sync. By understanding the principles and implications of block level file sync, you can make informed decisions when selecting a cloud storage provider that best suits your requirements.

Source: https://cloudstorageinfo.org/block-level-file-sync

This is box title

Linux-based file replication: file-level or block-level?

I’m sorry, but it seems that the given text is already in a summarized form and does not exceed 500 words. However, I can still break it up into shorter paragraphs for you:

I am currently re-architecting our backup solution and would like some input on how to do the replication portion. We have two sites, one much larger than the other, that we need to back up.

I have two Linux servers that will share out their volumes via either NFS/iSCSI/SMB (I haven’t fully decided which to go with yet). The files that will be stored on these volumes will most likely be VMDK – so just single, large files – which will contain backups using either VMWare Data Recovery or Veeam (also haven’t decided which to use).

Now comes the tricky part.. I would like to replicate these VMDK’s to both servers. So server A will have its own VMDK, and server B will have its own VMDK.

Should I use something like Rsync to periodically replicate the files themselves to the other server, or would it be better to utilize something like DRBD+GFS2 to replicate stuff as it changes at the block level, essentially giving me an active/active clustered file system? Keep in mind that the VMDK’s will not be modified in both locations. That is, server A will never modify a VMDK that is primarily housed on server B and vice-versa.

Please let me know if you need any more information and thanks for any input!

I’ve worked on a couple of similar systems in the past (for VM storage replication, no less!). In general, I’m more comfortable with the scheduled-rsyncs solution as we found DRBD setup to be tricky and a little brittle, but you do have the disadvantage that if a failure happens between rsyncs, you lose the changes.

How frequently do these files change / how recent does a backup have to be in case of failure?

DRBD is better in the sense that the block devices are being updated continuously, which is a big plus and allowed faster VM failover for us. But we did find the setup (and debugging if something went wrong) more difficult.

I’d generally say use DRBD if you need that kind of redundancy, or rsync if you consider these more cold/infrequent backups.

(We also tried some fairly wild stuff: iSCSI (actually, SRP)-exported block devices from two different servers, with software RAID applied to the block devices on server #3. But we didn’t keep that around long enough to test it much.)

I hope this breakdown is helpful to you!

Source: https://serverfault.com/questions/258261/linux-based-file-replication-file-level-or-block-level

This is box title

Block level storage vs. file level storage: A comparison

do not use the following words: article, author, author’s name, personal name, this text, text, content, summary and do not copy the title, and Summarize the following at least 500 words in length and Break it up into shorter paragraphs (not need use word paragraph ) : Block level storage vs. file level storage: A comparison
on February 18, 2011, 4:02 AM PST

Block level storage sales have gone through the roof as more businesses realize its flexibility. File level storage is still a better option when you just need a place to dump raw files. Learn more about when to use which type of storage.

Long gone are the days of one file server sitting in a corner humming away while employees save their files to the local hard drives. Today, storage devices are abstracted from the server.

IT pros are now required to make important decisions when choosing storage for a particular task. To help with your decision making process, here’s an overview of some of the high-level differences between block level storage and file level storage. I also provide information about when to use which type of storage.

Block level storage
Anyone who has used a Storage Area Network (SAN) has probably used block level storage before. Block level storage presents itself to servers using industry standard Fibre Channel and iSCSI connectivity mechanisms. In its most basic form, think of block level storage as a hard drive in a server except the hard drive happens to be installed in a remote chassis and is accessible using Fibre Channel or iSCSI.

When it comes to flexibility and versatility, you can’t beat block level storage. In a block level storage device, raw storage volumes are created, and then the server-based operating system connects to these volumes and uses them as individual hard drives. This makes block level storage usable for almost any kind of application, including file storage, database storage, virtual machine file system (VMFS) volumes, and more. You can place any kind of file system on block level storage. So, if you’re running Windows, your volumes will be formatted with NTFS; VMware servers will use VMFS.

File level storage devices are often used to share files with users. By creating a block-based volume and then installing an operating system and attaching to that volume, you can share files out using that native operating system. Remember, when you use a block-based volume, you’re basically using a blank hard drive with which you can do anything.

When it comes to backup, many storage devices include replication-type capabilities, but you still need to think about how to protect your workloads. With this type of storage, it’s not unusual for an organization to be able to use operating system native backup tools or third-party backup tools such as (DPM) to back up files. Since the storage looks and acts like a normal hard drive, special backup steps don’t need to be taken.

With regard to management complexity, block-based storage devices tend to be more complex than their file-based counterparts; this is the tradeoff you get for the added flexibility. Block storage device administrators must:

From a use case standpoint, there are a lot of applications that make use of this block-level shared storage, including:

File level storage
Although block level storage is extremely flexible, nothing beats the simplicity of file level storage when all that’s needed is a place to dump raw files. After all, simply having a centralized, highly available, and accessible place to store files and folders remains the most critical need in many organizations. These file level devices — usually Network Attached Storage (NAS) devices — provide a lot of space at what is generally a lower cost than block level storage.

File level storage is usually accessible using common file level protocols such as SMB/CIFS (Windows) and NFS (Linux, VMware). In the block level world, you need to create a volume, deploy an OS, and then attach to the created volume; in the file level world, the storage device handles the files and folders on the device. This also means that, in many cases, the file level storage device or NAS needs to handle user access control and permissions assignment. Some devices will integrate into existing authentication and security systems.

On the backup front, file level storage devices sometimes require special handling since they might run non-standard operating systems, so keep that in mind if you decide to go the file level route.

With the caveat that you may need to take some steps with regard to authentication, permissions, and backup, file level-only devices are usually easier to set up than block level devices. In many cases, the process can be as simple as walking through a short configuration tool and moving forward.

If you’re looking for storage that screams — that is, if you need high levels of storage performance — be very careful with the file level option. In most cases, if you need high levels of performance, you should look at the block level options. Block level devices are generally configurable for capacity and performance. Although file-level devices do have a performance component, capacity is usually the bigger consideration.

File level use cases are generally:

Convergence of block and file storage
The block and file worlds are converging. Some new storage devices include both block and file-level capabilities. So if you are torn about whether to go with block or file, a hybrid/converged device might fit your needs.

Source: https://www.techrepublic.com/article/block-level-storage-vs-file-level-storage-a-comparison/

This is box title

Does Google Drive sync entire file again on making small changes?

The feature you are asking about is known as Block-Level File Copying. It allows for efficient syncing of files by sending only the changed parts (delta) of a file when you make modifications, instead of copying the entire file from your hard drive to the cloud server again.

Unlike some other cloud providers, Google Drive does not support partial syncing. If you make a small change to a large file, Google Drive will redo the entire file transfer rather than just updating the specific change. This means that Google Drive lacks block-level file copying capability.

However, Dropbox is one of the cloud providers that does offer this feature for all file types. Whenever a file is uploaded to Dropbox, it is divided into 4MB blocks. Each block is hashed using SHA-256, and the resulting hashes are stored in a blocklist for reference. This allows Dropbox to sync only the modified blocks of a file, providing efficient and quick updates.

Another cloud provider that supports block-level file copying is OneDrive. However, OneDrive’s implementation is limited to Microsoft Office documents. This means that if you make changes to an Office document stored in OneDrive, only the modified parts of the file will be synchronized, rather than the entire document.

For more detailed information and performance benchmarks on this topic, please refer to the article.

Source: https://superuser.com/questions/1368892/does-google-drive-sync-entire-file-again-on-making-small-changes

This is box title

How to achieve block-level delta copy

Block-level delta copy is an efficient method of file transfer that focuses on optimizing performance and reducing data transfer. It allows only the parts of a file that have changed to be transferred, rather than sending the entire file. This results in faster transfers and reduces bandwidth usage.

GoodSync Connect is a feature that enables direct peer-to-peer connections between two computers, eliminating the need for intermediate servers to store files. This not only increases transfer speeds but also enhances file privacy since the files are not stored on third-party servers.

To achieve block-level delta copy with GoodSync, certain conditions must be met. Firstly, both computers involved in the file transfer must have the GoodSync application installed. Additionally, during the account setup process, both sides must have selected the option to Serve files to other devices. This setting can be accessed by clicking the Tools menu (Windows) or the GoodSync menu (Mac) and navigating to the Account Setup section.

Both devices must also be registered under the same GoodSync Account. This ensures that they are recognized as authorized devices within the system. Lastly, the GoodSync job itself must use GoodSync Connect, which can be enabled by selecting GoodSync Connect on both the left and right side browse menus within the application.

Once these conditions are met, block-level delta copy will be automatically enabled for all backup and sync jobs between the devices. It is important to note that block-level delta copy cannot be achieved when performing backup and sync operations between a user’s computer and a cloud storage service account.

By utilizing block-level delta copy and GoodSync Connect, users can experience faster and more efficient file transfers while maintaining the privacy and security of their data.

Source: https://help.goodsync.com/hc/en-us/articles/360002346092-How-to-achieve-block-level-delta-copy

This is box title

Azure file sync – delta/block level syncing · Issue #68776 · MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs

Azure File Sync is a powerful tool provided by Microsoft that offers delta/block level syncing capabilities. This functionality allows for efficient synchronization of files and folders between servers and Azure Files. By utilizing delta sync, only the modified portions of files are transferred, reducing network bandwidth consumption and improving overall performance.

When it comes to syncing files between on-premises servers and Azure Files, Azure File Sync operates at the block level. This means that instead of transferring entire files, only the changed blocks within those files are synchronized. By doing so, Azure File Sync minimizes data transfer and optimizes the synchronization process.

The block level syncing functionality of Azure File Sync is achieved through the use of a change journal. A change journal is a record of changes made to files and directories within a file system. Azure File Sync leverages the change journal to identify which blocks within a file have been modified. This information allows the tool to transfer only the necessary blocks, rather than the entire file.

By employing delta sync, Azure File Sync provides several benefits. First and foremost, it reduces network utilization. Only transmitting the modified portions of files significantly reduces the amount of data that needs to be transferred over the network, resulting in improved synchronization speed and reduced bandwidth consumption.

Additionally, delta sync helps optimize storage costs. By synchronizing only the changed blocks, Azure File Sync minimizes the storage requirements in Azure Files. This efficient use of storage space translates to cost savings for organizations using Azure File Sync.

Another advantage of Azure File Sync’s delta sync capability is enhanced performance. As only the modified blocks are transferred, the synchronization process becomes faster and more efficient. This is particularly beneficial when dealing with large files or frequent changes to files, as only the necessary data is transmitted, reducing overall sync time.

It is important to note that delta sync is not enabled by default in Azure File Sync. Administrators need to enable this feature to take advantage of the block level syncing capabilities. By configuring delta sync, organizations can optimize their file synchronization processes and improve overall efficiency.

In conclusion, Azure File Sync offers delta/block level syncing functionality, allowing for efficient synchronization of files and folders between servers and Azure Files. By utilizing a change journal and syncing only the modified blocks, Azure File Sync minimizes network bandwidth consumption, optimizes storage costs, and enhances performance. Enabling delta sync in Azure File Sync enables organizations to take full advantage of these benefits and streamline their file synchronization workflows.

Source: https://github.com/MicrosoftDocs/azure-docs/issues/68776

Leave a Comment